Hillary Clinton: Need ban on assault rifles

Hillary Clinton answers a question about where she stands on gun control in the wake of school shootings. More from CNN at http://www.cnn.com/ To license thi…
Video Rating: 1 / 5

24 thoughts on “Hillary Clinton: Need ban on assault rifles

  1. TheCrustyFry

    What a totalitarian bitch. What she is basically saying is that she wants
    the 51% unintelligent majority to completely vote away the rights of the
    49% who are awake and not zombies for the police state. And im not even
    sure she has the majority on her side on this issue at all, Its more 60%
    against and 40% in favor in the newer gallup polls. Talk about being out of
    touch. 

    Reply
  2. Albert Avinger

    AR-15’s and shit like that wasn’t around when James Madison wrote the bill
    of rights, so I think every gun that can fire more than 1 bullet in a 5
    minute span should be banned… Muskets for the win!

    Reply
  3. GOD719

    Hey Hillary. If you are anti gun and insinuate gun owners are terrorist.
    You shouldn’t have armed Al Qaeda rebels in Syria and Libya while pushing
    gun control here. It makes you look like a dumbass.

    Reply
  4. iservesocial

    When I see a clinton all i can think of is poor innocent murdered kids in
    mena. Why doesn’t someone ask her about that?

    Reply
  5. SubliminalOrigami

    How do you do a background check on teenagers?
    Especially killers like the Columbine kids who buy the guns illegally?
    All a law does is lock out the innocent… it does not stop the criminal by
    DEFINITION.
    It’s not a solution.

    Reply
  6. Oscar Meyer

    Hillary doesn’t respect OUR Constitution. Those who believe in the 2cd
    amendment are not terrorists, nor in the minority. Fucking bitch is a
    straight up lying machine.

    Reply
  7. elliaddy2

    Extremely offensive how she refers to gun rights supporters as a small
    violence-prone minority who terrorizes the majority. The truth is that gun
    rights supporters are the vast majority. The NRA is funded by millions of
    citizens who believe in the cause. The *gun control* people are the real
    minority, as they are funded by a small handful of multibillionaires and
    politicians and the idiots they manage to pull to their cause. People like
    Michael Bloomberg and the $50 million he pledged anti-gun causes. He is
    the Minority using his money to terrorize the majority! The NRA is our
    collective voice fighting back.

    Also offensive how manipulative she is, obviously exploiting the left
    wing’s ignorance about firearms. She is banking on her listeners and
    supporters being clueless about guns and she uses this to make her cause
    sound more logical and just.

    Example: Multiple times she uses the term “automatic weapon” in regards to
    school shootings and violence in our society. “I don’t think any parent
    should have to fear about their child going to school because someone could
    possibly enter that school property with an automatic weapon and murder
    innocent children, students, teachers.” This is intentionally twisted to
    mislead people.

    “Automatic weapons” are the “weapons of war”, such as the m16, and these
    are already illegal on a federal level in all but the most controlled
    circumstances, including a very expensive registration process. These are
    weapons that you can pull the trigger, and bullets keep shooting out.

    What she really “meant” to refer to was “semi-automatic” weapons.
    Semi-Automatic is the current standard for modern civilian firearms, and it
    means that 1 trigger pull will shoot 1 bullet. To shoot another bullet you
    have to release the trigger and pull the trigger again. For example, a
    police officer’s service pistol is semi-automatic. The infamous AR15 is
    also semi-automatic. There is a lot of confusion and misinformation about
    the ar15, which again is a civilian semi-automatic weapon, because it is
    modeled to look like an m16, which is a fully automatic military weapon, a
    “weapon of war”.

    A gun that is *not* classified as automatic or semi-automatic would be
    those which involve some kind of manual cocking action between each shot,
    kind of like in the wild west, how they had to pull the hammer back before
    each shot. Other examples of a non-semi-automatic weapon would be rifles
    that have to be operated with a lever or bolt between each shot, as well as
    shotguns that have to be pumped.

    So understanding the difference between manual action, semi-automatic, and
    automatic, and understanding the fact that *automatic* weapons are
    currently effectively illegal (with strict exceptions), we can try to sort
    out what Hillary Clinton is actually trying to communicate. It certainly
    isn’t a push against automatic weapons, because those are already
    controlled.

    As she refers to incidents like Sandy Hook, one can imagine she must be
    referring to semi-automatic weapons which as described above, is an
    entirely different classification of weapons, which includes a huge portion
    of the modern firearms, and almost all of the modern pistols. This is not
    about getting weapons of war off the streets. This is about dialing back
    the gun rights of citizens back to the wild west technology. In the
    process, it is also dialing back American’s right to self reliance and
    independence when dealing with matters of personal defense and safety of
    the family. It is replacing that self reliance with a forced helplessness
    and a dependence on an increasingly militarized police force, which always
    gets there after everyone is already dead and raped anyway.

    Police response = Sandy hook 2012
    Civilian response = Clackamas Town Center, Oregon Mall 2012

    Reply
  8. jimmi161

    They passed so called universal background checks in Colorado, they also
    banned standard capacity magazines in Colorado, and a few months later
    there was a school shooting in Colorado. They love to ignore that their
    laws never affect those who break the law.

    Reply
  9. shsfresh87

    When was the last time an automatic weapon was used in a mass killing in
    the U.S.? All the guns I’ve seen have been SEMI-AUTOMATIC

    Reply
  10. vadimxp

    I JUST READ OVER 200 COMMENTS AND ARE ARE PRO GUN RIGHTS FUCK HILLARY! FUCK
    THE FED FUCK ROTHCHILD FUCK THE SYSTEM!!! IF IT AINT GOLD BASED ITS FAKE

    Reply
  11. jis2cool

    She’s going to win if she runs. No matter who the Republican runner is.
    How can you anybody be against universal background checks? It won’t stop
    all mass shootings, but will without a doubt lower the risk. These
    ammosexuals are insane.
    The sad thing is, I’m not even really surprised anymore when some psycho
    shoots a bunch of random people in this country. How many more times does
    this have to happen before you conservatives realize that our guns laws
    need to modified.
    No, I don’t believe guns should be banned, however, not everyone in this
    country should own a gun. I’m not just talking about felons, but those with
    a history of violence and or mental illness. If we had universal background
    checks, we can make it more difficult for these kind of people to obtain
    guns. 

    Reply
  12. ArticBeatle

    I’m so happy this is on the record. Hopefully we can put a pro-gun canidate
    like Ted Cruz or Rand Paul up against her.

    Reply
  13. Sean D'Sauveterre

    Yeah, yeah, gun control, blah, blah, blah We cannot let a minority of
    people… hold a viewpoint… WTF?!!!

    Reply
  14. Zac B. Studios

    So let me get this straight. If I continue to keep this mindset that all
    American citizens have THE RIGHT, to bear arms, I’m terrorizing the
    “majority” of Americans?… really? So you’re basically suggesting that gun
    control is the answer, when CLEARLY it doesn’t do a damn thing to stop
    criminals from assaulting people like myself. Putting up more (unnecessary)
    gun regulations just makes their job easier. Do you have any logical sense
    at all, if any?

    Reply
  15. ForTehNguyen

    sheeples gonna sheep Remember what happened to Congress when they passed a
    AWB in 1994? Universal background checks wouldnt have done crap in sandy
    hook when he kills his mother and takes her guns. Yea a background check
    is going to help. She needs to stop lying about automatic weapons

    Reply
  16. alwayzhated2010

    AUTOMATIC WEAPONS ARE HEAVILY REGULATED THRU THE BATFE DOES THIS BITCH
    EVEN KNOW WHAT THE FUCK SHES TALKING ABOUT…SHES A PUPPET FOR THE BANKERS
    WHO RUN THIS COUNTRY.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *